Dönüşümcü Liderlik, Sosyal Değişim İdeolojisi, İşyeri Sosyal Dâhil Edilme, İşte İyi Olma Hali ve Örgüte Duygusal Bağlılık İlişkileri

Author :  

Year-Number: 2019-5
Language : null
Konu : Yönetim
Number of pages: 957-974
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Amaç: Araştırmanın amacı sağlık çalışanlarında dönüşümcü liderlik, sosyal değişim ideolojisi, işyeri sosyal dâhil edilme, işte iyi olma hali ve örgüte duygusal bağlılık ilişkilerinin araştırılmasıdır. Yöntem: Araştırma Konya ilinde 5 hastaneden 350 sağlık çalışanı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada SPSS 10.0 ile tanımlayıcı istatistikler, korelasyon analizi, Lisrel 8.0 ile doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve yapısal eşitlik modeli uygulanmıştır. Araştırmada yer alan ölçeklerin doğrulayıcı faktör analiziyle yapısal geçerliliği ve Cronbach Alpha katsayısıyla yapı güvenilirliği araştırılmıştır. Bulgular: Araştırma sonucunda dönüşümcü liderlik sosyal dâhil edilmeyi ve duygusal bağlılığı etkilemekte; sosyal dâhil edilme de işte iyi olma halini olumlu yönde etkilemektedir. Sosyal dâhil edilmeyi etkileyen değişken ise sosyal değişim ideolojisi bulunmuştur. Tartışma: Bu çalışmanın sonuçları doğrultusunda dönüşümcü liderlik tarzının sosyal dahil edilmeyi kolaylaştıracağı ve örgüte olan bağlılığı da arttıracağı söylenebilir. Ayrıca çalışanların karşılıklı beklenti içerisinde olmaları örgüte dahil olmalarını kolaylaştırmaktadır.

Keywords

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to research the transformational leadership, social change ideology, workplace social inclusion, well being at work and affective commitment relations to the association among the healthcare employees. Design:/Methodology/Approach: The research was conducted with 350 healthcare employees from 5 hospitals in the city of Konya.In the study, descriptive statistics and correlation analysis were performed via SPSS 10.0. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation model were applied via Lisrel 8.0. The structural validity of the scale in the study was investigated with the confirmatory factor analysis and their structural reliability was investigated with the Cronbach Alpha coefficient. Findings: As a result of the study,it is seen that the transformational leadership influences social inclusion and affective commitment, and social inclusion has a positive influence on well being at work. It is found that the factor which influences social inclusion is social change ideology. Discussion: According to the results of this study, it can be said that transformational leadership style will facilitate social inclusion and increase the commitment to the organization. In addition, the expectation of the employees with the spoon makes it easier for them to be included in the organization.

Keywords


  • Agenda C. (2007). What’s happening with well-being at work?, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, 151.

  • Akgül, A. & Çevik, O. (2003). İstatistiksel Analiz Teknikleri: Spss’ de İşletme Yönetimi Uygulamaları, Ankara, Emek Ofset Ltd. Şti.

  • Allen, N.J. & Meyer J.P. (1990). The measurement and Aantecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.

  • Allen, N.J. & Grisaffe, D.B. (2001). Employee commitment to the organizations and customer reactions, mepping the linkages, Human Resource Management Review, 11, 209 – 236.

  • Altunel, M. C. (2009). Yerel halkın turizmin gelişmesine verdiği desteği etkileyen faktörlerin sosyal değişim teorisi açısından incelenmesi: Alaçatı örneği. T.C. Sakarya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Yüksek Lisans Tezi.

  • Altunışık, R. Coşkun, R. Bayraktaroğlu, S. & Yıldırım, E. (2010). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri: Spss Uygulamalı, İstanbul, Sakarya Yayıncılık. Aslan, Ş. (2013). Geçmişten Günümüze Liderlik Kuramları (Sağlık Yönetimi Bakış Açısıyla), Konya, Eğitim Kitabevi.

  • Avolio, B.J. Zhu, W. Koh, W. & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 951-968.

  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: a comment, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 375-381.

  • Balcı, F. (2001). Psikolojik ve öznel iyi olma hali ile dini inançlar arasındaki ilişki üzerine bir inceleme. Uludağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Felsefe Ve Din Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı Din Psikolojisi Bilim, 1-191.

  • Bradburn, N.M. (1969). The Structure Of Psychological Well-Being, Chicago, Aldine Publishing Company.

  • Bass, B.M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations, New York, The Free Press.

  • Bass, B.M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: learning to share the vision, Organizational Dynamics, 19(3), 19-31.

  • Bass, B.M. (1997). Personal selling and transformational / transactional leadership, The Journal of Personal Selling& Sales Management, 17(3), 19-28.

  • Bass B.M. & Avolio B.J. (1994). Introduction. in improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership, Sage,

  • Bayram, L. (2005). Yönetimde yeni bir paradigma: örgütsel bağlılık, Sayıştay Dergisi, 59, 125-139.

  • Berson, Y. & Avolio, B.J (2004). Transformational leadership and the dissemination of organizational goals: a case study of telecommunication firm, The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 626–646.

  • Boekhorst, J.A. (2015). The role of authentıc leadershıp in fostering workplace inclusıon: a socıal informatıon processıng perspectıve, Human Resource Management, 54(2), 241–264.

  • Bryman A, & Cramer D, (2001). Quantitative data analysis with spss 12 and 13; a guide for social scientists. Taylor&Francis Group, London and New York. ISBN 0-203-49818-6 Master e-book ISBN, 1-359.

  • Buonocore, F., Metallo, C., & Salvatore, D. (2009). Behavioural consequences of job insecurity and perceived insider status for contingent workers. In System Congress (pp. 1-29).

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2003). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı, Ankara, Pegem A Yayınları.

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. Çokluk, Ö. & Köklü, N. (2012). Sosyal Bilimler için İstatistik, Ankara, Pegem Akademi. Cacioppe, R. (1997). Leadership moment by moment, Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 18(7), 335-345.

  • Ceylan, A. Keskin, H. & Eren, Ş. (2005). Dönüşümcü ve etkileşimci liderlik ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişkilere yönelik bir araştırma, Yönetim, 16(51), 32-42.

  • Chou, P. (2013). The effect of transformational leadership on follower’s affective commitment to change”. World Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 38 – 52.

  • Collins, J. (2004). İyiden Mükemmel Şirkete. (Çeviren: Levent Cinemre) İstanbul, Boyner Yayınları.

  • Christopher J.C. (1999). Situating psychological well-being: exploring the cultural roots of its theory and research, Journal of Counseling and Deveelopment, 77, 141-152.

  • Çalıkoğlu, E. (2004) Muharip Subay ve Astsubayların Etkileşimci ve Dönüşümcü Liderlik Tarzlarının Muharebe Performansları İle İlişkisi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler enstitüsü, İşletme Ana Bilim Dalı Yüksek lisans Tezi.

  • Çınaroğlu, S. (2012). Yönetim eğitiminde yeni yaklaşımlar ve hastanelerde profesyonel yönetici ihtiyacı, Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 15(1), 79-110.

  • Daniels, K. (2000). Measures of five aspects of affective well-being at work, Human Relations, 53(2), 275–294.

  • Deci E.L. & Ryan R.M. (2008). Living well: a self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia, Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139-170.

  • Diener, E. & Fujita, F. (1995). Resources, personal striving and subjective well-being, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 120-132.

  • Diener, E. Suh, E. & Oishi, S. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being, Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24(1), 25-41.

  • Dugan, J.S.(2006). “Perceived Organizational Support, Social Exchange Ideology, and Data Manipulation Behaviors Among Substance Abuse Treatment Utilization Reviewers”, Lincoln University, Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Psychology.

  • DeCotiis, T.A. & Summers T.P. (1987). A path analysis of a model of the antecedents and consequences of organizational commitment, Human Relations, 40(7), 445-470.

  • Dick, G. & Metcalfe, B. (2001). Manegerial factors and organizational commitment, The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 14, 111– 128.

  • Eisenberger, R. Huntington, R. Hutchison, S. & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507.

  • Gao, F.Y. & Bai, S. (2011). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational commitment of family employees in chinese family business, 2011 International Conference on Economics, Trade and Development IPEDR 7.

  • Gürsoy, D. & Kendall, K.W. (2006). Hosting mega events: modeling locals’ supports, Annals of Tourism Research, 33(3), 603–623.

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.

  • Hemedoğlu, E. & Evliyaoğlu, F. (2012). Çalışanların dönüşümcü liderlik algılarının örgütsel bağlılıkları üzerindeki etkilerinin incelenmesi, İşletme Araştırma Dergisi, 58-77.

  • Hater, J.J. & Bass, B.M. (1988). Superiors evaluations and subordinates perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership, Jornal of Applied Psychology, 73(4), 695-702.

  • Homans, G.C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange, American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.

  • Hooper, D.Coughlan,J. & Mullen,M.R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit, Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.

  • Hui, S. (2003), Revision of genetic regulatory models using structural equation modeling/path analysis, http://zencaroline.blogspot.com/2007/06/compositereliability.html (Erişim Tarihi: 3 Kasım

  • İşcan, Ö.F. (2006). Dönüştürücü/etkileşimci liderlik algısı ve örgütsel özdeşleşme ilişkisinde bireysel farlılıkların rolü, Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F.Dergisi, 11, 160–177.

  • Jandaghi, G. Matin, H.Z. & Farjami, A. (2008). Comparing transformational leadership in successful and unsuccessful companies, The Journal of International Social Research, 2(6), 356-372.

  • Kalaycı, Ş. (2014). Spss Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri, Ankara, Asil Yayın Dağıtım Ltd. Şti.

  • Kanste, O. Miettunen, J. & Kynga, S.H. (2006). Psychometric properties of the multifactor leadership questionnaire among nurses, Journal of Advanced Nursing 57(2), 201–212.

  • Kayasandık, A.E. (2013). İş-Aile Çatışması Ve Duygusal Bağlılık İlişkisinde Algılanan Örgütsel Adaletin Düzenleyici Rolü. Nevşehir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi.

  • Kayat, K. (2002). Power, social exchanges and tourism in Langkawi: rethinking resident perceptions, International Journal of Tourism Research, 4(3), 171–191.

  • Keegan, A.E. & Hartog, D.N.D. (2004). Transformational leadership in a project-based enviroment: a comparative study of the leadership styles of project managers and line managers, Project Management, 22, 609–617.

  • Keyes, C.L. Shmotkin, D. & Ryff, C. (2002). Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007-1022.

  • Kılıç, R. & Keklik B. (2012). Sağlık çalışanlarında iş yaşam kalitesi ve motivasyona etkisi üzerine bir araştırma, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, İİBF Dergisi, XIV(II).

  • Kissi, J. Dainty, A. & Tuuli, M. (2013). Examining the role of transformational leadership of portfolio managers inproject performance, International Journal of Project Management 31, 485–497.

  • Köklü, N. Büyüköztürk, Ş. & Bökeoğlu, Ö.Ç. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler İçin İstatistik., Ankara, Pegem A Yayıncılık.

  • Köksal, O. (2012). Sosyal değişim teorisi çerçevesinde güven ve algılanan aidiyet durumunun örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ve saldırgan davranışlar üzerine etkisi. T.C. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Anabilim Dalı Yönetim Ve Organizasyon Bilim Dalı. Doktora Tezi. Kayseri.

  • Lambe, C. J. Wittmann, C.M. & Spekman, R.E. (2001). Social exchange theory and research on business to business relational exchange, Journal of Business to Business Marketing, 8(3), 1-36.

  • Larson, M.D. (2004). “Positive Psychological Capital: A Comparison With Human And Social Capitalans An Analysis of A Training Intervention”. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Nebraska.

  • Leana, C.R. & Van Buren, H.J. (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices”. academy of management review, 24, 538–555.

  • Lee, N. & Cadogan, J.W. (2009). Sales force social exchange in problem resolution situation, Industrial Marketing Management, 38, 355–372.

  • Lee, J. J.Y. Capella, M.L. Taylor, C.R. Luo, M. & Gabler, C.B. (2014). The financial impact of loyalty programs in the hotel industry: a social exchange theory perspective, Journal of Business Research, 67, 2139–2146.

  • Li, S.R. Ragu-Nathan T.S. & Ragu-Nathan B. (2005). Development and validation of a measurement instrument for studying supply chain management practices, Journal of Operations Management, 23, 618–641.

  • Li, C. Zhao, H. & Begley, T.M. (2015). Transformational leadership dimensions and employee creativity in china: a cross-level analysis, Journal of Business Research 68, 1149–1156.

  • Major, G. Terraschke, A. Major, E. & Setijadi, C. (2014). Working it out: migrants’ perspectıves of social inclusion in the workplace, Australian Review of Apllied Linguistics, 37(3), 249-261.

  • Masterson, S.S. & Stamper, C.L. (2003). Perceived organizational membership: an aggregate framework representing the employee-organization relationship, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 24, 473-490.

  • McCunn, L.J. & Gifford, R. (2014). Interrelations between sense of place, organizational commitment and green neighborhoods, Cities, 41, 20–29.

  • Meyer J.P. & Allen, N.J. (1984). Testing the “side – bet theory” of organizational commitment: some methodological considerations, Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 372 – 378.

  • Meyer J.P. & Allen, N.J. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organizations, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1 – 18.

  • Meyer, J.P. & Allen, N.J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment, Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.

  • Meyer, J. Allen, P. Natalie, J. & Smith, C.A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: extension and test of a three-component conceptualization, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538-551.

  • Meyer, J.Allen, P. & Natalie, J. (1997). Commitmnet in The Workplace Theory Research and Application, California ,Sage Publication.

  • Meyer, J.P. & Smith, C.A. (2000). HRM practises and organizational commitment: test of a mediation model, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 17(4), 319-332.

  • Mowday, R.T. Steers, R.M. & Porter, L.W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224 – 247.

  • Moss, S.A. Mcfarland, J. Ngu, S. & Kıjowska, A. (2006). Maintaining an open mind to closed ındividuals: the effect of resource availability and leadership style on the association between openness to experience and organizational commitment, Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 1–17.

  • Mowday, R.T. (1998). Reflections on the study and relevance of organizational commitment, Human Resource Management Review, 8(4), 387-401.

  • Murat, G. & Açıkgöz, B. (2008). Değişim çağının vazgeçilmez aktörleri: dönüşümcü liderler, Kamu-İş, 10(2), 153-171.

  • Nemanich, L.A. & Keller R.T (2007). Transformational leadership in an acquisition: a field study of employees, The Leadership Quarterly,18, 49–68.

  • Palmer, B. Walls, M. Burgress Z. & Stough, C. (2001). Emotional intelligence and effective leadership, Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 22(1), 5-10.

  • Pearce, J.L. & Randel, A.E. (2004). Expectations of organizational mobility, workplace Social inclusion and employee performance, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 81-98.

  • Podsakoff, P.M. MacKenzie, S.B.Moorman, R.H. & Fetter, R.(1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effect on followers trust in leader, satisfaction an organizational citizenship behavior, Leadership Quarterly,1(2): 107-142.

  • Raykov, T. & Marcoulides G.A. (2006) A First Course İn Structural Equation Modeling. New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

  • Ryff, C.D. (1989a). Beyond ponce de leon and life satisfaction: new directions in quest of successful ageing, Internatıonal Journal of Behavıoral Development, 12 (1), 35-55.

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989b). Happiness is everything, or is it? explorations on the meaning of psychological well- being, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.

  • Sarıcaoğlu, H. ve Arslan, C. (2013). Üniversite öğrencilerinin psikolojik iyi olma düzeylerinin kişilik özellikleri ve öz-anlayış açısından incelenmesi, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(4),

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K. Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equa- equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit, Measures, Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8 (2), 23-74.

  • Searle, M. S. (2000). Is leisure theory needed for leisure studies?, Journal of Leisure Research, 32(1),

  • Shamir, B. House, R.J. and Arthur, B.M. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: a self- concept based theory, Organization Science, 4(4), 577-594.

  • Steiger, J.H. (1994). Factor analysis in the 1980’s and the 1990’s: some old debates and some new developments, Trends and Perspectives in Empirical Social Research, 201–224.

  • Sonay, F. (2013). Örgütsel bağlılık ve sağlık çalışanları. Beykent Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Yönetimi Anabilim Dalı, Hastane Ve Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi Bilim Dalı.

  • Stevens, J.P. (2009). Applied Multivariate Statistics For The Social Sciences, New York, London, Taylor&Francis Group,

  • Ramachandran, S. & Krishnan, V. R. (2009). Effect of transformational leadership on followers' affective and normative commitment: culture as moderator, Great Lakes Herald, 3(1), 23-38.

  • Tengilimoğlu, D. (2005). Kamu ve özel sektör örgütlerinde liderlik davranışı özelliklerinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir alan çalışması, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(14), 1–16.

  • Todd, R.J. (1999). Transformational leadership and transformational learning: information literacy and the world wide web, Nassp Bulletin, 605 (83), 4–12.

  • Velickovic, V.M. Visnjic, A. Jovic, S. Radulovic, O. Sargic, C. Mihajlovic, Jovan. & Mladenovic, J. (2014). Organizational commitment and job satisfaction amongnurses in serbia: a factor analysis. Science Direct, Nurs Outlook 62, 415 - 427.

  • War, P. (1990) The Measurment Of Well-Being And Other Aspects Of Mental Health, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 193-210.

  • Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organization a normative view, Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 418-428.

  • Yavuz, Ç. (2006). Rehberlik ve psikolojik danışmanlık öğrencilerinde öznel iyi olma hali, psikiyatrik belirtiler ve bazı kişilik özellikleri: karşılaştırmalı bir çalışma. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Eğitim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul, 1-126.

  • Yavuz, E. (2009). İşgörenlerin dönüşümcü liderlik ve örgütsel bağlılık ile ilgili tutumlarına yönelik bir araştırma, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi 1(2), 51-69.

  • Yücel, I. McMillan, A. & Richard, O.C. (2014). Does ceo transformational leadership ınfluence top executive normative commitment?, Journal of Business Research, 67, 1170–1177.

  • Zangora, G. (2001). Organizational Commitent: A Concept Analysis. Nusing Forum, 36(2), 14–22.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics