Hitit Üniversitesi Akademisyenlerinin Çevre Dostu Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon Algısı

Author :  

Year-Number: 2020-2
Language : İngilizce
Konu :
Number of pages: 176-187
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Petrol ve tekstil hazır giyim endüstrisi, çevre ve tarım arazileri için büyük kirlilik sorunlarına neden olmaktadır. Bu nedenle, çevre dostu tekstil ve hazır giyim (EFTA) ürünlerine ilgi son yıllarda artmıştır. Bu çalışmada akademisyenlerin EFTA algısını etkileyen faktörlerin ampirik olarak belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Hitit Üniversitesinde çalışan akademisyenlere Mart - Nisan 2018 döneminde anket uygulanmıştır. Veriler açımlayıcı faktör analizi, doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve yapısal eşitlik modeli kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Açımlayıcı faktör analizi sonuçlarına dayanarak, toplam varyansın% 83'ünü oluşturan dört faktörlü bir yapı elde edilmiştir. Bu faktörler sırasıyla Cronbach alfa katsayıları 0.901, 0.910, 0.922 ve 0.933 ile 'Duygusal Değer', 'Sosyal Değer', 'Kalite Değeri' ve 'Fiyat Değeri'dir. EFTA ürünlerinin ekonomik, kaliteli, sosyal ve duygusal değerleri nedeniyle tercih edildiği sonucuna varılmıştır. EFTA ürünlerinin kullanımının ve üretiminin teşvik edilmesi sürdürülebilir tarım ve çevre politikaları için önemlidir.

Keywords

Abstract

Petroleum and textile apparel industry cause major pollution problems for the environment and agricultural land. Therefore, interest in eco-friendly textile and apparel (EFTA) products has increased in recent years. This study aimed to determine empirically the factors affecting academicians' perception of EFTA. A questionnaire study was performed on Hitit University academicians in March - April 2018 period. Data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation model. Based on the explanatory factor analysis results, a four-factor structure was obtained, which constitutes 83% of the total variance. These factors were 'Emotional Value', 'Social Value', 'Quality Value' and 'Price Value' with Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.901, 0.910, 0.922 and 0.933, respectively. It was concluded that EFTA products are not economical but preferred because of their quality, social and emotional values. Encouragement of use and production of EFTA products is important for sustainable agriculture and environmental policies.

Keywords


  • Barber, N. A.; Bishop, M. & Gruen, T. (2014). "Who pays more (or less) for pro-environmental consumer goods? Using the auction method to assess actual willingness-to-pay", Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 218-227.

  • Bayraktar, T. (2005). Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon Sektöründe Ekoloji ve Ekolojik Etiketler. İTKİB AR&GE ve Mevzuat Şubesi, İstanbul, 1-3.

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull, 107(2), 238-46.

  • Biswas, A., & Roy, M. (2015). Green products: an exploratory study on the consumer behaviour in emerging economies of the East. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 463-468.

  • Biswas, K.M.; Ridwan, K.M., & Datta, A. (2019). A proposal of sustainable and integrated plant for jute fiber extraction in an eco-friendly manner. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 10, Issue 1, January-2019 801 ISSN 2229-5518.

  • Bruntland, G. (1987). Our common future. The World Commission on Environment 1 and Development, 45-65.

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2017). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Atıf İndeksi, 1-213.

  • Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.

  • Chen, H.-L., & Burns, L. D. (2006). Environmental Analysis of Textile Products. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24(3), 248-261. doi:10.1177/0887302x06293065.

  • Chi, T. (2015). Consumer perceived value of environmentally friendly apparel: an empirical study of Chinese consumers. The Journal of The Textile Institute, 106(10), 1038-1050. doi:10.1080/00405000.2014.985879.

  • Chi, T., & Kilduff, P. P. D. (2011). Understanding consumer perceived value of casual sportswear: An empirical study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18(5), 422-429. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.06.004.

  • Conca, J. (2015). Making climate change fashionable—the garment industry takes on global warming. Accessed, 1,

  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal Bilimler için Çok Değişkenli İstatistik: Spss ve Lisrel Uygulamaları, 2. Baskı, Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yay. Eğt. Dan. Hizm. Tic Ltd. Şti, Şubat.

  • De Angelis M., Amatulli C., & Pinato G. (2020) Sustainability in the Apparel Industry: The Role of Consumers’ Fashion Consciousness. In: Muthu S., Gardetti M. (eds) Sustainability in the Textile and Apparel Industries. Sustainable Textiles: Production, Processing, Manufacturing & Chemistry, Springer, Cham.

  • E., H. B. J., & S., N. P. (2011). Willingness to pay for socially responsible products: case of cotton apparel. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(5), 344-353. doi:doi:10.1108/07363761111149992.

  • Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). "Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes", Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 56-83.

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage publications.

  • Fletcher, K. (2008). Sustainable fashion and textiles: design journeys, Earthscan. London, Sterling.

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.

  • Hair, J. F., Gabriel, M., & Patel, V. (2014). AMOS covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM): Guidelines on its application as a marketing research tool.

  • Hawley, J. M. (2006). Digging for diamonds: A conceptual framework for understanding reclaimed textile products. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24(3), 262-275.

  • Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.

  • Institute, T. S. (2018). http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1046.

  • İşmal, Ö., & Yıldırım, L. (2012). Tekstil Tasarımında Çevre Dostu Yaklaşımlar, 1. Uluslararası Moda ve Tekstil Tasarımı Sempozyumu, Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Antalya, 38-42.

  • Jakhar, S. K. (2015). Performance evaluation and a flow allocation decision model for a sustainable supply chain of an apparel industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 391-413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.089.

  • Jordeva, S., Tomovska, E., Trajković, D., & Zafirova, K. (2015). "Current state of pre-consumer apparel waste management in Macedonia", Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe.

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.

  • Kang, J., Liu, C., & Kim, S.-H. (2013). "Environmentally sustainable textile and apparel consumption: the role of consumer knowledge, perceived consumer effectiveness and perceived personal relevance", International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(4), 442-452. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12013.

  • Khan, M. M., & Islam, M. M. (2015). Materials and manufacturing environmental sustainability evaluation of apparel product: knitted T-shirt case study. Textiles and Clothing Sustainability at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40689-0150008-8, 1-12.

  • Kim, H.-S., & Damhorst, M. L. (1998). Environmental Concern and Apparel Consumption. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 16(3), 126-133. doi:10.1177/0887302x9801600303.

  • Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.

  • Kunz, G. I., Garner, M. B., & Karpova, E. (2007). Going global: The textile and apparel industry. Fairchild New York.

  • Larney, M., & van Aardt, A. M. (2010). Case study: apparel industry waste management: a focus on recycling in South Africa. Waste Manag Res, 28(1), 36-43. doi:10.1177/0734242x09338729.

  • Liobikienė, G., Grincevičienė, Š., & Bernatonienė, J. (2017). "Environmentally friendly behaviour and green purchase in Austria and Lithuania", Journal of cleaner production, 142, 3789-3797.

  • Liobikienė, G., & Juknys, R. (2016). The role of values, environmental risk perception, awareness of consequences, and willingness to assume responsibility for environmentally-friendly behaviour: the Lithuanian case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3413-3422.

  • Liu, X., Wang, C., Shishime, T., & Fujitsuka, T. (2012). "Sustainable consumption: Green purchasing behaviours of urban residents in China", Sustainable Development, 20(4), 293-308. doi:doi:10.1002/sd.484.

  • Lomax, R. G., & Schumacker, R. E. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. psychology press.

  • Lorek, S., & Fuchs, D. (2013). Strong sustainable consumption governance–precondition for a degrowth path? Journal of cleaner production, 38, 36-43.

  • Muthu, S. S., Li, Y., Hu, J. Y., & Mok, P. Y. (2012). "Quantification of environmental impact and ecological sustainability for textile fibres", Ecological Indicators, 13(1), 66-74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.05.008.

  • Muthukumarana, T. T., Karunathilake, H. P., Punchihewa, H. K. G., Manthilake, M. M. I. D., & Hewage, K. N. (2018). "Life cycle environmental impacts of the apparel industry in Sri Lanka: Analysis of the energy sources", Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1346-1357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.261.

  • Network, G. F. (2010). Ecological footprint atlas 2010. Retrieved May, 25, 2014.

  • Niinimäki, K. (2013). Sustainable fashion: new approaches. Aalto University.

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1994). The assessment of reliability. Psychometric theory.

  • Oral, O., Dirgar, E., & Erdoğan, Ç. (2012). "Tekstil ve hazır giyim üretiminde ekoloji", Akdeniz Sanat Dergisi, 4(8), 31-34.

  • Onurlubaş, E , Çakirlar, H . (2017). Gazli İçecek Tüketiminde Tüketicilerin Marka Algisinin Belirlenmesi: Izmir Ili Örneği. journal of Life Economics, 4 (3), 93-112. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/jlecon/issue/37047/425895

  • Özdoğan, E., Korkmaz, A., & Seventekin, N. (2007). "Eko-Teks ve AB Çevre Etiketi", Tekstil Ve Konfeksiyon, 17(3), 148-

  • Öztürk, D , Karakaş, G . (2016). The Determination of Factors Influencing Brand Choice of the University Students: a Research on the Apparel Industry. Journal of Life Economics, 3 (4), 69-78. DOI: 10.15637/jlecon.175.

  • Palm, D. (2011). Improved waste management of textiles. IVL Report B, 1976.

  • Paryanto, Hans A. P. (2015). Dyes from Banana Leaf Stalks (musa ssp.) J E kuilibrium, vol.14, no. 2, hal.39-43.

  • Pereira Sánchez, M. Á., Vence Deza, X., Alcalde García, X. M., & Carballo Penela, A. (2019) INDITEX A Circular Economy Business Model Case. http://www.r2piproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Inditex-Case-Study_1.pdf

  • Ritter, Á. M., Borchardt, M., Vaccaro, G. L. R., Pereira, G. M., & Almeida, F. (2015). "Motivations for promoting the consumption of green products in an emerging country: exploring attitudes of Brazilian consumers", Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 507-520. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.066.

  • Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). "Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review", The Journal of educational research, 99(6), 323-338.

  • Shrivastava, P. (1995). The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 936-960. doi:10.2307/258961.

  • Smith, B. (1994). The Future of Pollution Prevention An Alternative to Costly Waste Treatment.

  • Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203-220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0.

  • TAN, M., Ayhan, E., & Baydaş, M. (2016). "Sustainability and cleaner production: case of textile and clothing sectors in Bingöl", The Journal of MacroTrends in Energy and Sustainability, 4(1), 22-33.

  • Thomas, S. (2008). From “Green Blur” to Ecofashion: Fashioning an Eco-lexicon. Fashion Theory, 12(4), 525-539. doi:10.2752/175174108X346977.

  • Tomovska, E., Jordeva, S., Trajković, D., & Zafirova, K. (2017). "Attitudes towards managing post-industrial apparel cuttings waste", The Journal of The Textile Institute, 108(2), 172-177. doi:10.1080/00405000.2016.1160764.

  • Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1-10.

  • Unal F., Avinc O., Yavas A. (2020) Sustainable Textile Designs Made from Renewable Biodegradable Sustainable Natural Abaca Fibers. In: Muthu S., Gardetti M. (eds) Sustainability in the Textile and Apparel Industries. Sustainable Textiles: Production, Processing, Manufacturing & Chemistry. Springer, Cham.

  • Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2008). Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 542-553. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.007.

  • Wang, P., Liu, Q., & Qi, Y. (2014). "Factors influencing sustainable consumption behaviors: a survey of the rural residents in China", Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 152-165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.007.

  • Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. doi:10.2307/1251446.

  • Zhao, H.-h., Gao, Q., Wu, Y.-p., Wang, Y., & Zhu, X.-d. (2014). "What affects green consumer behavior in China? A case study from Qingdao", Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 143-151.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics